Keyword summary
ā 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ole Miss Rebels results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,129 hits . Analysis detected 9,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,171 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (10,011 of 37,536 keywords). This Ole Miss Rebels is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Ole Miss Rebels
Keyword details
Total words: 5,171
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.3% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst