Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Old English Pronouns results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 2,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,336 of 37,536 keywords). This Old English Pronouns is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Old English Pronouns
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
4%Old English Pronouns (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos