Keyword summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Supply results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,342 hits. Analysis detected 4,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,865 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,513 of 35,081 keywords). This Oil Supply is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Oil Supply
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Oil Supply (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,865
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos