Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Official results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 4,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,255 of 37,536 keywords). This Official is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Official
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Official (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos