Keyword summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office Of The Inspector General results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (18,002 of 37,536 keywords). This Office Of The Inspector General is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Office Of The Inspector General
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos