Keyword summary
37%1 analyzed article/video602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ofcom results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,416 of 37,530 keywords). This Ofcom is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Ofcom
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
46%Ofcom (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,408
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos