Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oceano Dunes results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 340 hits . Analysis detected 3,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,107 of 37,536 keywords). This Oceano Dunes is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Oceano Dunes
Keyword details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst