Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Schools results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,038 hits . Analysis detected 5,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,840 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,089 of 35,976 keywords). This Nyc Schools is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Nyc Schools
Keyword details
Total words: 8,840
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst