Keyword summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Parks Department results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 768 hits . Analysis detected 4,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,338 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Parks Department is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Nyc Parks Department
Keyword details
Total words: 4,948
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst