Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Numat Technologies results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,698 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,839 of 37,536 keywords). This Numat Technologies is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Numat Technologies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Numat Technologies (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,698
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.1% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 21.7%21.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos