Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Secrets results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,132 hits. Analysis detected 4,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,991 of 37,536 keywords). This Nuclear Secrets is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Nuclear Secrets
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Nuclear Secrets (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,950
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos