Keyword summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Regulatory Commission results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,007 hits . Analysis detected 5,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,642 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,915 of 37,530 keywords). This Nuclear Regulatory Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 3,642
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.6% 27.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst