Keyword summary
94%2 analyzed articles/videos853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Plant results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 800 hits. Analysis detected 5,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (12,902 of 35,051 keywords). This Nuclear Plant is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Nuclear Plant
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
64%Nuclear Plant (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,672
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate