Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Negotiations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,054 hits . Analysis detected 7,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,364 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,465 of 36,906 keywords). This Nuclear Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Nuclear Negotiations
Keyword details
Total words: 8,364
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst