Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Enrichment results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,549 hits . Analysis detected 7,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,700 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,657 of 35,215 keywords). This Nuclear Enrichment is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Nuclear Enrichment
Keyword details
Total words: 10,700
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst