Keyword summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nrg Stadium results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,425 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,508 of 37,536 keywords). This Nrg Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Nrg Stadium
Keyword details
Total words: 1,425
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst