Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nova Classification results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 4,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 36,395 keywords). This Nova Classification is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nova Classification
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Nova Classification (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos