Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norwich results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 2,533 hits. Analysis detected 8,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,878 of 37,536 keywords). This Norwich is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Norwich
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%Norwich (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 37.6%37.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos