Keyword summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Northern Virginia results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 842 hits . Analysis detected 4,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,533 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,098 of 37,536 keywords). This Northern Virginia is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Northern Virginia
Keyword details
Total words: 7,533
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst