Keyword summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video1,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Coast Water Quality Control Board results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 852 hits. Analysis detected 4,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,931 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (27,875 of 37,536 keywords). This North Coast Water Quality Control Board is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
North Coast Water Quality Control Board
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,931
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos