Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Africa Campaign results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 4,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,626 of 37,536 keywords). This North Africa Campaign is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. North Africa Campaign
Keyword details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst