Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norovirus results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 4,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,176 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,789 of 37,536 keywords). This Norovirus is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Norovirus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
48%Norovirus (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,176
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos