Keyword summary
20%1 analyzed article/video1,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nordic Model results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 500 hits. Analysis detected 5,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,571 of 37,536 keywords). This Nordic Model is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Nordic Model
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
16%Nordic Model (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos