Keyword summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norcross results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,046 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,650 of 37,536 keywords). This Norcross is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Norcross
Keyword details
Total words: 5,046
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst