Keyword summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noblesville Boom results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 171 hits . Analysis detected 1,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,782 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (15,961 of 34,543 keywords). This Noblesville Boom is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Noblesville Boom
Keyword details
Total words: 1,782
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst