Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Gro January results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 2,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,752 of 37,536 keywords). This No Gro January is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. No Gro January
Keyword details
Total words: 4,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst