Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Contact Order results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 673 hits. Analysis detected 4,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,153 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,043 of 34,423 keywords). This No Contact Order is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
No Contact Order
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
89%No Contact Order (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,153
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 24.4%24.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 26.5%26.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 31.3%31.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 31.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos