Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Gold results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 523 hits . Analysis detected 5,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,881 of 37,764 keywords). This Nina Gold is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Nina Gold
Keyword details
Total words: 6,512
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst