Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nimitz Class results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 3,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,554 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,968 of 37,533 keywords). This Nimitz Class is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Nimitz Class
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
7%Nimitz Class (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,554
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos