Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicola Peltz Parts Ways Dog Rescue Charity Yogis House results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 3,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,316 of 37,536 keywords). This Nicola Peltz Parts Ways Dog Rescue Charity Yogis House is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Nicola Peltz Parts Ways Dog Rescue Charity Yogis House
Keyword details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.8% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 33.7% 33.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.1% 25.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst