Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicol Alexandra Contreras Suarez results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 2,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (6,608 of 37,536 keywords). This Nicol Alexandra Contreras Suarez is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Nicol Alexandra Contreras Suarez
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 27.9%27.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos