Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Nicholas Deml results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 776 hits . Analysis detected 6,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,083 keywords). This Nicholas Deml is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nicholas Deml
Keyword details
Total words: 8,396
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst