Keyword summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nhs England results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 179 hits . Analysis detected 509 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,742 of 37,536 keywords). This Nhs England is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Nhs England
Keyword details
Total words: 532
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.4% percentile 10.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles532 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 33.6% 33.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 33.6%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst