Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Nightlife results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 528 hits. Analysis detected 4,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (41,319 of 55,067 keywords). This New York Nightlife is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
New York Nightlife
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
25%New York Nightlife (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos