Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York Health Officials results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 265 hits . Analysis detected 1,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This New York Health Officials is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. New York Health Officials
Keyword details
Total words: 1,916
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst