Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York City Jails results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,925 keywords). This New York City Jails is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New York City Jails
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%New York City Jails (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos