Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York City Department Of Correction results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 513 hits . Analysis detected 3,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,768 keywords). This New York City Department Of Correction is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. New York City Department Of Correction
Keyword details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst