Keyword summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Millennium Car Wash results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,587 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,740 of 37,536 keywords). This New Millennium Car Wash is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
New Millennium Car Wash
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,587
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos