Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netflix Lawsuit results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 3,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,105 of 37,536 keywords). This Netflix Lawsuit is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Netflix Lawsuit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Netflix Lawsuit (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.3%13.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos