Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neolithic results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 2,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,832 of 37,536 keywords). This Neolithic is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Neolithic
Keyword details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst