Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Neoconservatism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,169 hits . Analysis detected 13,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,112 keywords). This Neoconservatism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Neoconservatism
Keyword details
Total words: 16,200
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst