Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neocolonialism results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 1,209 hits . Analysis detected 5,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,414 of 37,536 keywords). This Neocolonialism is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Neocolonialism
Keyword details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.6% percentile 8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 61.1% 61.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.2% 26.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 61.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst