Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nato Us Hegseth Pentagon Review Europe Spending results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Us Hegseth Pentagon Review Europe Spending is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nato Us Hegseth Pentagon Review Europe Spending
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos