Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Security Threat results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 7,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,206 of 37,536 keywords). This National Security Threat is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
National Security Threat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%National Security Threat (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 46.0%46.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 35.6%35.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.6%27.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 46.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos