Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Security Authority results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 937 hits . Analysis detected 5,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This National Security Authority is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. National Security Authority
Keyword details
Total words: 5,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst