Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Guard Trump Washington Dc Residents results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This National Guard Trump Washington Dc Residents is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
National Guard Trump Washington Dc Residents
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,205
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos