Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Forest results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 197 hits . Analysis detected 2,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,067 of 34,832 keywords). This National Forest is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. National Forest
Keyword details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst