Keyword summary
64%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Endowment For The Humanities results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,091 of 34,692 keywords). This National Endowment For The Humanities is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
National Endowment For The Humanities
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
92%National Endowment For The Humanities (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 882
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.1% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles882 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.1%23.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos