Keyword summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Assembly results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 1,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,401 of 37,536 keywords). This National Assembly is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. National Assembly
Keyword details
Total words: 4,012
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst