Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Academy Of Sciences results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 4,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This National Academy Of Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
National Academy Of Sciences
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%National Academy Of Sciences (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 21.0%21.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos